AASF: Australian Agricultural Sustainability Framework

AASF: Australian Agricultural Sustainability Framework

Developing an Australian Agricultural Sustainability Framework (AASF)

The first iteration of the AASF has now been developed for stakeholder feedback (see link above – AASF 1st iteration). As the framework contains many levels of information, this interactive PowerPoint (PPT) presentation has been designed to allow users to ‘dive in’ to areas of interest and ‘zoom out’ to see the context of the suggested principles, criteria and indicators. Supporting information on the design and development process is provided below and is also available via the literature review download link. If you are unable to use the interactive PPT, please download this static PDF version (same information without the interactive functionality).

To use the interactive document most effectively:

  1. Open the PPT, enable editing and click on presentation mode’ or ‘slide show’.
  2. Navigate the document by clicking to ‘zoom in’ (preferred interactive method). When you click on the images or boxes relating to each principle, criteria or indicator, the PPT will ‘zoom’ to show more detail.
  3. Click the ‘home’ icon on the screen at any time to be taken back to section starts (pillars) or the beginning slides of the framework.
  4. You can also use the arrow keys to move through the PPT as you would for a regular slide show. Pres ‘Esc’ to exit the slide show.

AFI is seeking feedback on the language and intent of the principles (desired outcomes) and criteria (conditions to be met in order to comply with a principle) of this first iteration, which need to be relevant to both Australian agricultural industry sustainability frameworks and current / emerging global standards.

The AASF is intended to be a bridge between domestic and global systems by harmonising expectations and communication, so that industry collected data can be aggregated and used as the evidence base for Australian agriculture’s sustainability claims in the global market place and to meet supply chain requirements. Does this list of principles and criteria cover everything that is important? Are there principles and criteria which are irrelevant and could be excluded? NB – while the indicators (the measurable states which allow the assessment of whether or not a particular criterion has been met) presented herein are also important, our first focus is to ensure the principles and criteria are solid. Indicators and metrics will be the focus of further stages of development. A glossary of terms is also available.

Feedback can be submitted to the AFI via info@farminstitute.org.au

Background

Interest in the sustainability of agricultural and food systems is continuously increasing in markets, social and regulatory environments. While farmers clearly want to invest in sustainability measures and build natural capital, these measures usually involve cost to the farming business. AFI’s 2020 report, Recognising On-farm Biodiversity Management, identified the complexity, cost and difficulty of assessing and participating in multiple programs as barriers to participating in current sustainability/stewardship programs, including market-based initiatives. To reward farmers for delivering biodiversity and sustainability outcomes, the best results are likely to come from an overarching framework that connects and verifies current and emerging programs. Verifying farm sustainability schemes under such a meta-standard can help to build an Australian sustainability ‘brand’, benchmark outcomes for natural capital reporting systems, and enable certification against consistent targets and schemes. Based on the outcomes of this research, the next step is the development of an Australian Agricultural Sustainability Framework (AASF).

Project process

  • Phase 1: DISCOVERY (2020) – Recognising On-farm Biodiversity Management
  • Phase 2: DEVELOPMENT (2021) – AASF
  • Phase 3: PILOT (2022)

AFI is undertaking Element 1 (Framework Development) of the second phase of this project in 2021, in parallel with Element 2 (Financial Systems & Accounting Systems) led by KPMG. Four further connected elements of this phase, including benchmarking industry programs, aligning measurement frameworks, engagement and legal analysis, are being coordinated by the NFF on behalf of the Federal Government (DAWE).

The process for developing the AASF involves intensive research and extensive consultation throughout the year. In the first quarter of 2021, AFI has reviewed existing schemes and worked with a specialist expert reference panel of subject matter experts to ensure a rigorous peer review process informs development. This group of academic, industry and NGO experts, representing a cross-section of the best experience and insight available on the topic of verifying farm sustainability and biodiversity (see Appendix in the literature review), has already provided invaluable feedback and advice to the research team on the relevance and suitability of existing systems, industry opportunities and gaps, as well as emerging global sustainability reporting trend and requirements (see examples below).

Findings so far

 

Findings to date suggest that an AASF could aim to achieve:

  • Reduction in the complexity of the SCA landscape for sustainability initiatives
  • Reducing duplication of scheme targets 
  • Management of market access risks 

And an AASF should seek to avoid:

  • Arbitrarily increasing the number of SCA sustainability schemes
  • Competing directly with the certification and accreditation industry
  • Seeking to set standards independently of international bodies 

The first iteration of the AASF has now been developed for stakeholder feedback (see links above). AFI will consult with a range of sector stakeholders (in parallel with KPMG market stakeholder interviews) to ensure that the framework development is tailored to meet industry needs and supply/demand drivers. Open feedback on the principles (desired outcomes) and criteria (conditions to be met in order to comply with a principle) of this first iteration as described above can be submitted to the AFI via info@farminstitute.org.au

Following the consultation process, this first iteration will be reviewed and refined, then presented again for further feedback in September 2021. The final version of the AASF is due for delivery in January 2022; however, it will not be a static document. The AASF will provide a regularly updated snapshot in time to enable harmonisation of Australian agricultural sustainability activity with evolving market and regulatory expectations. 

Ownership and governance of the AASF will be a crucial recommendation at completion of this project, to ensure the framework will be an independent, responsive tool to help ensure Australian farmers are recognised for their efforts in stewardship of our resources.

Global standards and frameworks:

To be successful, the AASF must be concordant with global standards to leverage stewardship efforts in the global marketplace and enable progress towards international sustainability reporting obligations. While an AASF should clearly not seek to match every existing global SCA framework or scheme, some directly relevant and related global programs have been considered in design and development of the first iteration, as noted below:

Published 1 Dec 2020

Early in 2020 the Australian Farm Institute undertook a research project on behalf of the National Farmer’s Federation for Phase 1 of the Australian Farm Biodiversity Certification Scheme, which is a component of the Australian Government’s $34 million Agricultural Stewardship package. This project reviewed best practice management standards and collated extensive feedback…
15
Oct
2019

15-10-2019 09:00 AM - 15-10-2019 10:00 PM

Much of global agriculture is now sustained by payments for delivery of ecosystem services. In Australia the agricultural ecosystems services market is immature to non-existent. Can and should ecosystem services become a more significant part of the Australian agricultural economy? The Valuing Agriculture’s Natural Capital Roundtable sessions ran from 9 am – 5 pm, followed directly…

Published 1 Sep 2019

The Spring Journal outlines what ecosystem services are, how they might be delivered and examines the potential for what will essentially be a new sector for Australian agriculture. Ecosystem services provide the opportunity for new sources of income and incentivisation for protection of Australian agriculture’s natural capital. However, there are…

Published 1 Jun 2019

Climate change is a ‘wicked problem’ representing not only a threat to the Australian agricultural sector’s profitability and international competitiveness but also to our long-term food security and the viability of some regional communities. The agriculture sector is both vulnerable to and partially responsible for the heightened challenges brought about…

Published 7 Jun 2021

The CRSPI Climate and Emissions Reduction in Agriculture Forum was held online over 29–30 March 2021. The Forum explored the state of climate change research in Australian agriculture, with sessions including ‘Agriculture in a low emissions economy’ chaired by Richard Heath, Australian Farm Institute Executive Director, as well as updates…

Related Products

Published 16 Aug 2021

Government policies aimed at addressing risk in Australian agriculture have a long and chequered history. While a range of government programs and schemes intended to improve management of financial risks is available to Australian farmers, there is little evidence to indicate that the majority of past policies can be considered…

Published 21 Jul 2021

‘Regenerative’ farming is gaining attention, particularly of policy makers and not-for-profits who increasingly direct funding to support regenerative agriculture (RA) initiatives. RA practitioners have been referred to as ‘disruptors’ – farmers who introduce new processes, challenging traditional practices and creating new markets. We review the range of practices that could…

Published 21 Jul 2021

As Australia’s fastest growing sector, agri-food is second only to mining in terms of its importance to the national economy. But agri-food has an important decision to make – to what extent it will continue business as usual, exporting untapped value-add potential with every container of raw commodity. Alternatively, it…
Scroll to Top

Sign up for news on AFI research, events and publications